Sources/EU/ECHR

From Dura Lex Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

European Court of Human Rights decisions from the HUDOC database. Judgments and admissibility decisions. Year-by-year from 1959, with automatic splitting for high-volume years. Parallel downloads (32 workers).

Status: active

Source

[edit | edit source]
Key Kind Origin Auth Update
echr decision HUDOC search API — hudoc.echr.coe.int/app/query/results none incremental (year-by-year)

ID format: eu.echr_{itemid}:{language} (e.g. eu.echr_001-12345:fr)

Coverage: 1959–present

Classification

[edit | edit source]
Tag Values Notes
type judgment always (both judgments and decisions)
nature ARRÊT (JUDGMENTS collection) or DÉCISION (DECISIONS collection)
document_form canonical_text, dissenting_opinion, concurring_opinion, separate_opinion detected via docname regex
court echr always
court_level supranational always

Grades

[edit | edit source]
official_grade importance_level Meaning
1 highest_importance Key case (ECHR Reports)
2 high_importance High importance
3 medium_importance Medium importance
4 low_importance Low importance

Formation

[edit | edit source]
formation_solemnity Criteria
grand_bench "Grande chambre" in chamber label
standard_bench section/chamber (not committee, not grand)
reduced_bench "Comité" or "(comité)" in label

Chamber label derived from originatingbody (section ID) and doctypebranch. 5 sections (Première–Cinquième) with optional committee qualifier.

Domain-specific

[edit | edit source]
Tag Notes
respondent_state defendant country (e.g. "FRA")
has_separate_opinion "true" or "false"
echr_branch admissibility, admissibility_committee, grand_chamber_decision (when applicable)
chamber full chamber label in French
solution conclusion field from HUDOC
summary headnote extracted from bordered CSS box in HTML
ecli ECLI string
case_number application numbers (split by ";")
translation_pending target language code when no sibling found

Edges

[edit | edit source]
kind Direction Trigger
language_variant EN ↔ FR post-ingest LLM translation enrichment
[edit | edit source]
Source Relationship
cjeu Separate court system (Council of Europe vs EU). Different grade system, different formation model.

Limitations

[edit | edit source]
  • Only language="fr" ingested — multi-language support planned
  • needs_review: "echr_chamber_unmapped" when neither branch nor body resolved to known mapping
  • No citation edges between ECHR decisions
  • Formation solemnity not available for single-judge decisions (no single_judge value set)