Sources/FR/Cass

From Dura Lex Wiki
Revision as of 01:52, 23 April 2026 by Nicolas (talk | contribs) (Source doc: cass — Cour de cassation (DILA) (via create-page on MediaWiki MCP Server))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Cour de cassation decisions from the DILA open data platform. Historical depth back to 1750. Shares coverage with judilibre for post-2021 decisions — judilibre has richer metadata (summaries, themes, finer grades), cass has deeper historical coverage.

Status: active

Source

[edit | edit source]
Key Kind Origin Auth Update
cass decision DILA open data dump — echanges.dila.gouv.fr/OPENDATA/CASS/ none incremental (tar.gz archives)

ID format: fr.{raw_id.lower()}

Coverage: 1750–present

Classification

[edit | edit source]
Tag Values When
type judgment default
type advisory_opinion FORMATION starts with "AVIS" or NATURE = "avis"
nature raw NATURE field
court cour_cassation always
court_level supreme always

Grades

[edit | edit source]
official_grade importance_level Source signal
bulletin high_importance PUBLI_BULL@publie="oui"
diffuse low_importance default (no PUBLI_BULL or publie="non")

Less granular than judilibre which also has rapport, non_diffuse, and particular_interest.

Formation

[edit | edit source]
formation_solemnity Criteria
full_court "assemblée plénière"
grand_bench "chambre mixte"
combined_chambers "réunies"
standard_bench default
reduced_bench "formation restreinte"

Identifiers

[edit | edit source]
Tag Format
ecli ECLI string (normalized)
case_number array from NUMEROS_AFFAIRES

Domain-specific

[edit | edit source]
Tag Notes
chamber from META_JURI_JUDI/FORMATION
formation raw formation string
solution decision outcome
summary from SOMMAIRE (when available)
headnote_classification from ANA/SCT elements

Edges

[edit | edit source]

None.

[edit | edit source]
Source Relationship
judilibre Overlaps for CC post-2021. Judilibre has summaries, themes, rapport/non_diffuse grades.
inca Legacy. Some older decisions may appear in both.

Limitations

[edit | edit source]
  • No summaries or headnote classifications for most decisions (unlike judilibre)
  • Grade system less granular than judilibre (no rapport/non_diffuse distinction)
  • Pre-2021 decisions may lack ECLI