Main Page: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Fix navigation links: point to actual pages instead of categories (via update-page on MediaWiki MCP Server) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Dura Lex''' is an open-source operating system for legal data. | |||
It structures public legal data — legislation, case law, company registries, administrative guidance — into a jurisdiction-agnostic corpus, queryable by AI agents via MCP and by humans via a web portal. | |||
== | A jurisdiction-agnostic kernel, jurisdiction plugins (France and EU today, designed for any country), a robust ingestion pipeline, and services on top. The schema follows the OpenStreetMap model — six universal structural kinds, JSONB tags, zero schema migration to add a jurisdiction. | ||
Everything is published as '''Python libraries''' (MIT). The kernel, the corpus protocol, the jurisdiction drivers, the ingestion framework — all are composable packages that can be embedded in any application. Use the MCP server as-is, or import the libraries directly to build your own legal data product. | |||
Software licensed under '''MIT'''. Enriched data licensed under '''ODbL'''. | |||
== Navigation == | |||
{| class="wikitable" | |||
|- | |||
! Section !! Description | |||
|- | |||
| [[Philosophy]] || Why Dura Lex exists — safety, transparency, sovereignty, professional secrecy | |||
|- | |||
| [[Architecture]] || How the pieces fit together — kernel, drivers, pipeline, services | |||
|- | |||
| [[Corpus]] || The data model — schema, tags, edges, quality, temporal versioning, FTS | |||
|- | |||
| [[Sources]] || Data dictionary — one page per ingest source, coverage matrix | |||
|- | |||
| [[Jurisdictions]] || Legal systems we cover and how they map to the unified schema | |||
|- | |||
| [[MCP]] || The public API — tools, safety guidelines, reference resolution | |||
|- | |||
| [[Development]] || For contributors — coding conventions, testing, packaging | |||
|- | |||
| [[:Category:Design decisions|Design decisions]] || Architectural decision records (coming soon) | |||
|} | |||
== Current data == | |||
France is the first implementation. The architecture is designed for any jurisdiction. | |||
{| class="wikitable" | |||
|- | |||
! Jurisdiction !! Data !! Volume | |||
|- | |||
| rowspan="7" | '''France''' || Court decisions || 3.4M | |||
|- | |||
| Legislation articles || 1.8M | |||
|- | |||
| Collective agreements || 299K articles + 382K enterprise agreements | |||
|- | |||
| Administrative doctrine || 9.6K | |||
|- | |||
| Companies || 24.2M | |||
|- | |||
| Directors || 15M | |||
|- | |||
| Cross-citations || 4.4M links | |||
|- | |||
| rowspan="3" | '''EU''' || CJEU decisions || — | |||
|- | |||
| ECHR decisions || — | |||
|- | |||
| EU legislation (regulations, directives, decisions) || — | |||
|} | |||
== License == | |||
Code: [https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT MIT]. Data: [https://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/ ODbL]. | |||
Latest revision as of 02:24, 23 April 2026
Dura Lex is an open-source operating system for legal data.
It structures public legal data — legislation, case law, company registries, administrative guidance — into a jurisdiction-agnostic corpus, queryable by AI agents via MCP and by humans via a web portal.
A jurisdiction-agnostic kernel, jurisdiction plugins (France and EU today, designed for any country), a robust ingestion pipeline, and services on top. The schema follows the OpenStreetMap model — six universal structural kinds, JSONB tags, zero schema migration to add a jurisdiction.
Everything is published as Python libraries (MIT). The kernel, the corpus protocol, the jurisdiction drivers, the ingestion framework — all are composable packages that can be embedded in any application. Use the MCP server as-is, or import the libraries directly to build your own legal data product.
Software licensed under MIT. Enriched data licensed under ODbL.
Navigation
[edit | edit source]| Section | Description |
|---|---|
| Philosophy | Why Dura Lex exists — safety, transparency, sovereignty, professional secrecy |
| Architecture | How the pieces fit together — kernel, drivers, pipeline, services |
| Corpus | The data model — schema, tags, edges, quality, temporal versioning, FTS |
| Sources | Data dictionary — one page per ingest source, coverage matrix |
| Jurisdictions | Legal systems we cover and how they map to the unified schema |
| MCP | The public API — tools, safety guidelines, reference resolution |
| Development | For contributors — coding conventions, testing, packaging |
| Design decisions | Architectural decision records (coming soon) |
Current data
[edit | edit source]France is the first implementation. The architecture is designed for any jurisdiction.
| Jurisdiction | Data | Volume |
|---|---|---|
| France | Court decisions | 3.4M |
| Legislation articles | 1.8M | |
| Collective agreements | 299K articles + 382K enterprise agreements | |
| Administrative doctrine | 9.6K | |
| Companies | 24.2M | |
| Directors | 15M | |
| Cross-citations | 4.4M links | |
| EU | CJEU decisions | — |
| ECHR decisions | — | |
| EU legislation (regulations, directives, decisions) | — |