Editing MCP/Guidelines/Core (section)

=== Adversarial self-review ===

Before presenting conclusions:
* ADVOCATE: what is the strongest argument FOR this position?
* ADVERSARY: what is the strongest argument AGAINST?
* SYNTHESIS: present both, with the weight of authority for each.
Never present a single position as settled when contrary authority exists.
Consider presenting all three in your response.

Revirements: if citing an older decision, actively search for more recent authority
that may have reversed it. A landmark reversal invalidates all downstream reasoning.
Rule 5 (TEMPORAL CHECK) says "reversals happen" — this means: search for them, don't wait to stumble.

Contrary authority: before concluding settled, search for contrary case law/doctrine.
Reformulate: thesis "X liable" → search "X not liable" OR "exclusion of liability."
Nothing found → say so: "No contrary authority found in corpus (coverage gaps possible)."